St. Thomas Divorce & Family Law Blog

The Point Having an emotional connection with the pet is not enough to establish ownership.  A Dog and Two Lawyers Two years ago, a decision came out that decided who got the dog in a separation. I find it interesting because of how the dispute started and that fact that there was only one dog but two people arguing over it.  In a previous post, I wrote about a case that had two dogs in dispute during a separation, and each partner ended up receiving one dog each. The judge seemed to take a broad approach to deciding. There is also an intuitive dimension where it's easier to say, 'Keep one each and call it a day.' But in the case I'm about to introduce, the dog could not be split two ways and it appears that the classic way of finding out who owns something was used by the judge to decide who got to keep the dog. The classic way is finding out who is the registered owner (or, who is on title).  In this case , the dog was a Boxer named Layla.  Photo credit: IslandHopp...

Courts that Have Tried Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution On May 14, 2021, a pilot was started to test whether a new type of dispute resolution would help people in a family law court dispute, while at the same time clearing the backlog in the courts. Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution (Binding JDR) was started in Simcoe and Muskoka. In March 2022,  it was extended to Peterborough, Lindsay and Cobourg. It has also since been extended to Kitchener-Waterloo. In the pilot, both sides had to voluntarily agree to take this path toward a settlement or judicial decision in their case - instead of following the regular procedure. Binding JDR is a hybrid animal with certain features of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. Photo credit: Sora Shimazaki What is a Settlement Conference? To recap my previous post , a settlement conference is an informal hearing that allows both sides to get an opinion from a judge as to how he or she would decide the case if it were at trial. ...

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...

The Difference between “Retroactive” and “Arrears” Decisions about child support or spousal support are usually forward looking. However, a court may also be asked to look backwards to deal with support that should have been paid. There are two scenarios that may apply to your situation: (1) arrears of support, and (2) retroactive support. Arrears and retroactivity apply to child support and spousal support. Photo credit: Nataliya Vaitkevich Arrears Arrears of support are those amounts that a person failed to pay but was required to do so by a contract (e.g., separation agreement) or court order. Determining the precise amount of arrears is not always straightforward. The amount depends on how long the arrears were accumulating, the amount of each payment and the frequency. Arrears: A Real-life Example In one case, a father agreed in a separation agreement signed in 2008 that he would pay child support of $10,000 per year for his two children. Except for a $5,000 lump sum, however, he ...

Your Dear Pet and Family Law  You've had a long and hard day. As soon as you walk in the door, there's your dog there to great you and so happy to see you. It's like therapy. But when two people separate, they will have to negotiate who gets certain property in the division or equalization of their assets. If they can’t agree, a court will decide.  The question comes up, Who gets the dog? If there’s more than one, Who gets which dog? And so on for whatever beloved pet or animal that we have had during the relationship. We have such a strong emotional connection with our pets. This is one more stressful aspect to layer on to the other aspects of separation and divorce that people have to deal with. The emotional support that one gets from their pet may be a major coping mechanism to see them through the divorce. Legal Status of Animals in Ontario In the eyes of the law, pets are personal property. There are laws that govern how we are to treat pets or how many we are permitt...

Family Law Court Process - The Settlement Conference In previous articles, I wrote about what you could expect at early stages of the family law court process. The procedure is that after a case conference and possibly a motion, another pre-trial hearing called a settlement conference is scheduled. At times a settlement conference can be combined with a case conference, but often a settlement conference will be held separately and after all disclosure has been made. A matter cannot proceed to trial without having held a settlement conference. What Can I Expect at My Settlement Conference? A settlement conference is intended to promote resolution of the issues after all financial disclosure and reporting has been made to the parties and the court. With the benefit of the entire picture, a judge at a settlement conference is in a position to provide a judicial opinion that gives each party a solid assessment of the strengths and weaknesses...

Step 4:  What Is a Case Conference? After you have started a court action in family law, the first major appearance that you can expect to have is a pre-trial hearing called a case conference. The case conference has been called the most important step in family law litigation. This hearing is held in front of a judge and allows both sides, either self-represented or with their lawyers, to obtain orders on procedural matters and possibly hear a judge’s view of the case at an early stage.  While a judge may offer preliminary opinions on the issues, no binding decision will be made on a substantive issue in your case. Obtaining a judge’s feedback can be helpful because it allows the parties to see their arguments from a different point of view and possibly reassess the strength of their claims. In turn, this may help to resolve matters through negotiation or mediation. Photo credit: Diane Webb What Can I Expect at My Case Co...