St. Thomas Divorce & Family Law Blog

  Limitations vs. Delay in Seeking Support One thing you should always discuss with your lawyer early on - preferably at the first consultation - is whether there is a time limit to collect a certain sum of money. In law, there are limitations periods to consider and there is delay.  Photo credit: Jordan Benson What is a Limitations Period? A limitations period means that you have only a certain amount of time to bring someone to court to get something that you believe you are owed. After the time is up, you can't get any relief on that issue. Ontario law sets up certain time limits for certain types of claims. In divorce and family law situations, generally the time limit to make a court application for a property matter is up to 2 years after a divorce, or 6 years after a separation, whichever comes first. For example, if a person and their spouse separate on January 1, 2023, and they own a house and cars together and dispute how much money one of them is owed, but they stil...

The Point Having an emotional connection with the pet is not enough to establish ownership.  A Dog and Two Lawyers Two years ago, a decision came out that decided who got the dog in a separation. I find it interesting because of how the dispute started and that fact that there was only one dog but two people arguing over it.  In a previous post, I wrote about a case that had two dogs in dispute during a separation, and each partner ended up receiving one dog each. The judge seemed to take a broad approach to deciding. There is also an intuitive dimension where it's easier to say, 'Keep one each and call it a day.' But in the case I'm about to introduce, the dog could not be split two ways and it appears that the classic way of finding out who owns something was used by the judge to decide who got to keep the dog. The classic way is finding out who is the registered owner (or, who is on title).  In this case , the dog was a Boxer named Layla.  Photo credit: IslandHopp...

Courts that Have Tried Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution On May 14, 2021, a pilot was started to test whether a new type of dispute resolution would help people in a family law court dispute, while at the same time clearing the backlog in the courts. Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution (Binding JDR) was started in Simcoe and Muskoka. In March 2022,  it was extended to Peterborough, Lindsay and Cobourg. It has also since been extended to Kitchener-Waterloo. In the pilot, both sides had to voluntarily agree to take this path toward a settlement or judicial decision in their case - instead of following the regular procedure. Binding JDR is a hybrid animal with certain features of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. Photo credit: Sora Shimazaki What is a Settlement Conference? To recap my previous post , a settlement conference is an informal hearing that allows both sides to get an opinion from a judge as to how he or she would decide the case if it were at trial. ...

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...

The Difference between “Retroactive” and “Arrears” Decisions about child support or spousal support are usually forward looking. However, a court may also be asked to look backwards to deal with support that should have been paid. There are two scenarios that may apply to your situation: (1) arrears of support, and (2) retroactive support. Arrears and retroactivity apply to child support and spousal support. Photo credit: Nataliya Vaitkevich Arrears Arrears of support are those amounts that a person failed to pay but was required to do so by a contract (e.g., separation agreement) or court order. Determining the precise amount of arrears is not always straightforward. The amount depends on how long the arrears were accumulating, the amount of each payment and the frequency. Arrears: A Real-life Example In one case, a father agreed in a separation agreement signed in 2008 that he would pay child support of $10,000 per year for his two children. Except for a $5,000 lump sum, however, he ...

Your Dear Pet and Family Law  You've had a long and hard day. As soon as you walk in the door, there's your dog there to great you and so happy to see you. It's like therapy. But when two people separate, they will have to negotiate who gets certain property in the division or equalization of their assets. If they can’t agree, a court will decide.  The question comes up, Who gets the dog? If there’s more than one, Who gets which dog? And so on for whatever beloved pet or animal that we have had during the relationship. We have such a strong emotional connection with our pets. This is one more stressful aspect to layer on to the other aspects of separation and divorce that people have to deal with. The emotional support that one gets from their pet may be a major coping mechanism to see them through the divorce. Legal Status of Animals in Ontario In the eyes of the law, pets are personal property. There are laws that govern how we are to treat pets or how many we are permitt...